The powers [of the institution] are unfortunately greater than me. '"Given the role the military has played in Harry's life—he undertook two tours of Afghanistan with the Army, and much of his charity work focuses on issues related to veterans—it's understandable. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io Meanwhile, Meghan’s official title is still Duchess of Sussex.

Otherwise, Harry retains that official title, as well as those of Earl of Dumbarton and Baron Kilkeel. We may earn commission on some of the items you choose to buy. You may be able to find more information on their web site. “It was so unnecessary,” Meghan reportedly told a friend.Earlier this year, when the Sussexes negotiated their new positions within the royal family, they were required to make sacrifices "As agreed in this new arrangement, they understand that they are required to step back from Royal duties, including official military appointments," reads the relevant portion of a statement issued by Buckingham Palace in January.While the Duke and Duchess "were not interviewed and did not contribute to" the book, according to a spokesperson, the biography "The most demoralising aspect of the deal was Harry being stripped of his honorary military appointments," reads the excerpt.

"Finding Freedom: Harry and Meghan and the Making of a Modern Royal Family This commenting section is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page. "'That’s been a tough pill to swallow, and one that has been most painful to Meghan witness him go through,' a source close to the couple said. 'It’s the one that made Harry emotional. See today's front and back pages, download the newspaper,

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses.

A new announcement from Buckingham Palace appears to confirm that Harry and Meghan will maintain their titles as Duke and Duchess of Sussex but not the HRH styling. "And it’s not just taking something away from him," the Duchess said, per Scobie and Durand. newspaper archive.Meghan Markle and Harry may still lose HRH styles as 'nothing is set in stone' - expert Meghan Markle and Harry: Harry was born an HRH but Meghan became one her wedding day How Prince Harry could be stripped of royal right when Charles kingAs Meghan and Harry’s initial royal exit deal with the Queen is only in place for a year, there is still a chance big changes could be made in future.Meghan Markle and Harry: The couple stepped away from royal life in March Meghan Markle heartbreak: How Prince William shattered Duchess' dreamKate Middeton and Prince William’s ‘brave move’ in royal life exposedMeghan Markle row: Lip-reader blows cover on what was REALLY saidPrince Harry reveals what he really misses in LA with MeghanQueen fury: Monarch forced to intervene in Megxit rowMeghan Markle and Harry: Their son Archie will take a royal title in future The book also reports that Megan told a friend that the decision "was so unnecessary." Please see our As part of the Megxit agreement reached with the Queen, it was decided the couple, who were made the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on their wedding day, would keep their HRH styles but not use them going forward.They will also not be allowed to use the word ‘royal’ in conjunction with their work going forward.These terms are outlined on the couple’s official website in the section titled “Spring 2020 transition.”The part of the statement on the HRH styles reads: “As agreed and set out in January, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will retain their ‘HRH’ prefix, thereby formally remaining known as His Royal Highness The Duke of Sussex and Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex.“The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will no longer actively use their HRH titles as they will no longer be working members of the family as of Spring 2020.”Their discontinued use of the word royal is touched on too in a paragraph that reads: “As The Duke and Duchess will no longer be considered full-time working Members of The Royal Family, it was agreed that use of the word ‘Royal’ would need to be reviewed as it pertains to organisations associated with them in this new regard.”The statement added: “While The Duke and Duchess are focused on plans to establish a new non-profit organisation, given the specific UK government rules surrounding use of the word ‘Royal’, it has been therefore agreed that their non-profit organisation will not utilise the name ‘Sussex Royal’ or any other iteration of ‘Royal.’“While there is not any jurisdiction by The Monarchy or Cabinet Office over the use of the word ‘Royal’ overseas, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex do not intend to use ‘Sussex Royal’ or any iteration of the word ‘Royal’ in any territory (either within the UK or otherwise) when the transition occurs Spring 2020.”According to an expert, nothing in the British constitution is binding and there have been royals who have lost their HRH styles in the past.Constitutional expert Iain MacMarthanne told Express.co.uk: “In its extreme form nothing within the British constitution is binding.“Royal Warrants can be issued at any time to address any matter either arising or one requiring rectification or clarification.

"It’s also that entire military veteran community. By Caroline Hallemann Town & Country participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer sites. order back issues and use the historic Daily Express As the senior digital news editor for Town & Country, Caroline Hallemann covers everything from the British royal family to the latest episodes of Outlander, Killing Eve, and The Crown.

Every item on this page was chosen by a Town & Country editor.